Janaki V Vs State Of Kerala Review: Suresh Gopi’s Courtroom Drama Feels Outdated in Today’s Chennai
Abhira 
‘Janaki V Vs State Of Kerala’ marks Suresh Gopi’s return to the big screen with a courtroom drama that unfortunately feels stuck in a bygone era. Set against the background of Kerala’s judicial system, the film attempts to explore intense legal battles and moral dilemmas but falls short due to its dated storytelling techniques.
Plot and Narrative
The story centers on Janaki, whose legal confrontation with the state brings several intense courtroom sequences to light. While the premise holds promise, the execution unfolds much like traditional courtroom dramas of the past. This results in a pacing and freshness that modern audiences might find lacking.
Direction and Style
The direction relies heavily on clichés and predictable tropes, which unfortunately diminishes the impact of the serious legal themes the film aims to address. The screenplay feels rehearsed rather than spontaneous, particularly in the dialogues, character development, and courtroom exchanges.
Performances and Technical Aspects
- Suresh Gopi’s Performance: Committed yet unable to transcend the conventional script.
- Editing and Background Score: These technical elements do little to energize the storytelling, leaving the film feeling flat and disengaged.
Overall Impression
With the global evolution in courtroom dramas, ‘Janaki V Vs State Of Kerala’ misses the opportunity to offer a nuanced and contemporary outlook on the genre. Its old-school approach feels mismatched with the current expectations of the audience.
In conclusion, while the film sheds light on Kerala’s legal environment and features a serious role for Suresh Gopi, its outdated style and storytelling make it less compelling. Cinephiles seeking gripping and modern legal drama might find the film lacking in punch and relevance.
Stay tuned for more updates from Flick Bites.
About The Author
